Welcome!Art ObservationOur ServicesPortfolioAbout UsNewswire serviceTips & ToolsNewsSubscribeContact UsGeology of Squilchuck Valley to Mission Ridge

  • Artist: John Ivar Chilman
  • Title of piece: unknown
  • Date: 2004
  • Approximate Dimensions: 9-1/2 x 11-1/2 in. canvas, gold frame, 13 x 15-1/2 in.
  • Location: hanging in my kitchen
  • Medium: Oil on Canvas 

 To see if I could approximate the difference between the actual oil painting, which I own, and a print, I took photos of the painting with different camera settings. Some settings used a flash others did not. You can see how the lighting changes the quality of the painting.

100_1180.JPG

Another photo of the oil painting, taken with a different camera setting, which makes the painting too dark. It needs the flash.

I.                   Descriptive: Focuses on form. Primarily a description of the subject matter and form.

This oil painting features a large two-story country home in the French countryside. The color composition is mainly yellow, blue and green, a combination of both warm and cool hues, accented by bits of red. This effect creates tension and energy, making the painting bright and cheery. Had the painting been done in an analogous color scheme, perhaps of mostly the yellows and oranges, without contrasting colors, it would have been warm and calming like Sanford Gifford's October in the Catskills. It's almost painted in primary colors - red, yellow and blue - but since the red has been minimized and the green, blue and yellow occur more or less equally, the primary colors don't immediately come to mind.  The artist has sought to harmonize the piece by using colors of the same intensity.

The home is the largest feature, painted in yellow, in simplistic terms, with a chimney, several windows, and an entry way with an overhanging roof. The home is very simple, not fancy, and a sandy path painted in a light tan leads up to the door, bordered on each side by colorful flowers in full bloom. The flowers are indistinct, blues, reds, yellows, purples, pinks. Some could be Holly hocks, roses, but none are in exacting detail, making the colors the more important aspect as they jump out in front of the house.

The artist has used an Impressionist style, similar to Claude Monet's Grainstack (Sunset), often painted outdoors in order to render the true colors of the scene. Based on Chilman's biography, I would assume he did paint this painting in the open air. He used a technique where the oil paint is applied very thick and then has been cut with a knife to create the texture of tall stocks and leaves and trees. Even the house is done in this texture as is the sky and clouds. Perhaps it would have been better to have created some contrast, where the house is smooth against the textured trees and plants, or where some of the original ground has been exposed.

The line is mainly an expressive one, which adds to the energy of the piece. The artist has used linear perspective to create distance and dimension in the house and in the pathway which narrows as it recedes in the distance.  The painting is divided equally in a vertical format, where the center of the piece is the line of the house so that the house occupies the left side of the painting. This is balanced by a tiny orange shed on the right and slightly below the house. The light clouds in the sky are balanced by the light of the pathway, which contrasts with the darks of the trees and flowers.

There is repetition in the thick paint strokes and texture as well as in the blobs of color representing the flowers. Motion is expressed in the clouds, which have been created in billowy white and blue and in the trees, which are indistinct but could be moving.

The painting is asymmetrical, leading the eye to the yellow house, which is the focal point. In this piece the details of the paint texture work to form regions: the tree grouping on the left, the flower grouping on the right, the green stalks at the front. All in all the elements of art and principles of design work together to unify the piece, although after analysis of the piece I see some things which could have improved it, as suggested above. The painting is framed in a gold embellished frame. Thus this creates an ideal version of country living.


100_1179.JPG

The lighting is better, but this is too small. I can see it's difficult to capture a painting with a camera.

100_1182.JPG

Oil painting on canvas, photo close up, without frame. This photo does not do the painting justice as it makes it look "muddy."

100_1177.JPG

I.                   Interpretive: Focuses on “content” or meaning. Explicates or explains the content. Form in relation to its meanings. In this case, the emphasis of the piece is on the house, based on its size and position in the piece, and we are given a glimpse into the beauty of nature, an ideal version of country living, with the path, the flowers, but the content or meaning of the piece is somewhat diluted because of a few details lacking. For example, the texturing is a feature of the entire work, so that nothing contrasts. The house almost appears empty, or unfinished because of the way minimal details have been included. There are no humans or animals in the painting to suggest life. So I think the artist’s primary aim was to show the beauty of the French countryside, the landscape, and the flowers. The realness of the flowers has been accomplished by the texture of the thick paint. There does seem to be movement in the sky, accomplished by the texture and alternation of the blue with the white. I would find more meaning if I were to see perhaps a little girl walking up the pathway with a basket of fresh flowers. When I purchased this painting, I saw a beautiful scene, one I’d like to live in, warm, because of the warm tones of the piece and the warm tones of the blues and reds of the flowers. That aspect is inviting. I’d also visited France, so I had a vision of that country, and I love French country decorating, so that’s why the painting appealed to me. 
II.                Evaluative: Focuses on the relative merits of the work. 

From an evaluative perspective, I can see that this painting falls short of perfection because not all the elements work together. There is too much texturing and it’s missing something, the human element. The painting is not inexhaustible, I start to see monotony if I continue to look at it, it’s as if I reach the end. Then I look away. It’s still beautiful, but it doesn’t compare with the Goya or Emanuel Leutze’s George Washington Crossing the Delaware, which I could stare at for hours. I don’t see insight in this work either, because the work does not inform me about the subject matter, country living. I’m not sure what others are saying about this artist’s work or this particular piece. This painting is marked as No. 5 of 38. But I have not been able to find information about the artist or his work. He was participating in the Fresh Paint Arts Festival at the Everett Marina in 2004, which is where I purchased this piece.


I took different pictures of the oil painting, with varying camera settings.

100_1178.JPG

Artist bio:“John-Ivar Chilman received a degree in Fine Art from New Mexico Western University and an MA from Pacific Lutheran University. His impressionistic oil paintings reflect his interest in the timeless beauty of French landscape and architecture. He captures the full range of color and luminosity of the French countryside. His work has been seen in local, national and international shows and collections. John-Ivar Chilman, 1168 Semanski St, Enumclaw WA 98022, rchilman@aol.com;” Art auction catalog.